Skip to content

Advertisement

Systematic Reviews

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A systematic review describing incidence rate and prevalence of dysvascular partial foot amputation; how both have changed over time and compare to transtibial amputation

Systematic Reviews20176:230

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0626-0

Received: 1 May 2017

Accepted: 13 November 2017

Published: 21 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Genesis Barbosa
15 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amalia Karahalios
18 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Michael Dillon
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amalia Karahalios
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0626-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Discipline of Prosthetics and Orthotics, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
(2)
Northwestern University Prosthetics-Orthotics Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA

Advertisement