This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Methodological quality and transparency of clinical practice guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of non-communicable diseases using the AGREE II instrument: a systematic review protocol
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 9 May 2017
Accepted: 23 October 2017
Published: 2 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrich Siering|
|10 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vicky Pileggi|
|29 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline Molino|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Caroline Molino|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0621-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.