Skip to content

Advertisement

Systematic Reviews

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reliability of measurements of the fractured clavicle: a systematic review

  • Paul Hoogervorst1Email author,
  • Gerjon Hannink1,
  • Arnoud R. van Geene2 and
  • Albert van Kampen1
Systematic Reviews20176:223

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0614-4

Received: 27 January 2017

Accepted: 19 October 2017

Published: 3 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vikas Kulshrestha
25 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jacob Schulz
17 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Paul Hoogervorst
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
19 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
3 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0614-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
(2)
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Advertisement