Skip to content


  • Commentary
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Authors’ response to comments from Nachman KE et al.

  • 1, 8Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 8,
  • 5 and
  • 7
Systematic Reviews20176:210

Received: 5 September 2017

Accepted: 16 October 2017

Published: 23 October 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
5 Sep 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Annette O'Connor
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0611-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, USA
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, Amarillo, USA
York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Department of Medicine, Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Department of Population Medicine, Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Department of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA
College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, USA