Syphilis in the Americas: a protocol for a systematic review of syphilis prevalence and incidence in four high-risk groups, 1980–2016
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danielle Burke|
|16 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernd Arents|
|18 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandro G Gonzalez|
|29 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ken Kitayama|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandro G Gonzalez|
|6 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernd Arents|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|10 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0595-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.