Skip to content


  • Protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 4, 5,
  • 4 and
  • 1, 4Email author
Systematic Reviews20176:182

Received: 27 February 2017

Accepted: 22 August 2017

Published: 7 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
27 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alejandro G Gonzalez
1 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Watt
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
7 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0572-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada