Skip to content

Advertisement

Systematic Reviews

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluative reports on medical malpractice policies in obstetrics: a rapid scoping review

  • Roberta Cardoso1,
  • Wasifa Zarin1,
  • Vera Nincic1,
  • Sarah Louise Barber2,
  • Ahmet Metin Gulmezoglu3,
  • Charlotte Wilson1,
  • Katherine Wilson1,
  • Heather McDonald1,
  • Meghan Kenny1,
  • Rachel Warren1,
  • Sharon E. Straus1, 4 and
  • Andrea C. Tricco1, 5Email author
Systematic Reviews20176:181

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0569-5

Received: 25 October 2016

Accepted: 22 August 2017

Published: 6 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johnson CT
26 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Umberto Genovese
26 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anthony Scholer
2 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Casali MB
29 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Roberta Cardoso
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Roberta Cardoso
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Roberta Cardoso
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0569-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
(2)
World Health Organization Kobe Centre, Kobe, Japan
(3)
Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Genève, Switzerland
(4)
Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(5)
Epidemiology Division, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Advertisement