This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Choice of initial antiretroviral drugs and treatment outcomes among HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 28 October 2016
Accepted: 15 August 2017
Published: 25 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Genesis S Barbosa|
|18 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ram Bajpai|
|22 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Machline Paim Paganella|
|18 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tadesse Awoke Ayele|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ram Bajpai|
|2 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Machline Paim Paganella|
|10 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tadesse Awoke Ayele|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ram Bajpai|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|25 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0567-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.