Skip to content


  • Protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A systematic review of decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision-making in chronic illnesses: a review protocol

  • 1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • 3,
  • 3, 4,
  • 3,
  • 1, 2,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 3 and
  • 1, 2, 5
Systematic Reviews20176:155

Received: 18 November 2016

Accepted: 1 August 2017

Published: 7 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
11 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Renata Yen
4 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Wieringa
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
7 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0557-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center (VUMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center and Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, “Dr. Jose E. González” University Hospital, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico
Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Medical Library, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands