This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Adverse outcomes associated with opioid prescription for acute low back pain: a systematic review protocol
- Natalia Mouravska1, 2, 3,
- Laura Zielinski1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
- Meha Bhatt2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
- Nitika Sanger2, 3, 7,
- Monica Bawor4, 8,
- Brittany Dennis4, 8,
- Laura Banfield9,
- James MacKillop4, 7,
- James Paul10,
- Andrew Worster4, 11,
- Philip Laplante7,
- Lehana Thabane12, 13 and
- Zainab Samaan2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14Email authorView ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 November 2016
Accepted: 1 August 2017
Published: 14 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|15 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tesfa Habtewold|
|31 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Junqiao Chen|
|30 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Natalia Mouravska|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|14 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0556-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.