Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Commentary
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Challenges and opportunities in country-specific research synthesis: a case study from Cameroon

Systematic Reviews20176:159

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0552-1

Received: 24 April 2017

Accepted: 31 July 2017

Published: 8 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brenda Nyakango
22 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karin Hannes
18 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
31 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0552-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
(2)
Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O’Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
(3)
Centre for the Development of Best Practices in Health, Yaoundé, Cameroon
(4)
Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
(5)
International Centre for Disability and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Advertisement