TY - BOOK AU - Swan, J. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Evidence in management decisions (EMD)—advancing knowledge utilization in healthcare management ID - Swan2012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ioannidis, J. P. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Meta-research: evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices JO - PLoS Biol VL - 13 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264 DO - 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264 ID - Ioannidis2015 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Page, M. J. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study JO - BMJ Open VL - 6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011863 DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011863 ID - Page2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Flacco, M. E. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor JO - J Clin Epidemiol VL - 68 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.016 DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.016 ID - Flacco2015 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Moher, D. PY - 2007 DA - 2007// TI - Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews JO - PLoS Med VL - 4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078 DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078 ID - Moher2007 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Page, M. J. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2 DO - 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2 ID - Page2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Pussegoda, K. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study JO - Systematic Reviews VL - 6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6 DO - 10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6 ID - Pussegoda2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Iqbal, S. A. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Reproducible research practices and transparency across the biomedical literature JO - PLoS Biol VL - 14 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333 DO - 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333 ID - Iqbal2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ioannidis, J. P. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Discussion: why “an estimate of the science-wise false discovery rate and application to the top medical literature” is false JO - Biostatistics VL - 15 UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxt036 DO - 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt036 ID - Ioannidis2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Egger, M. AU - Smith, G. D. PY - 1998 DA - 1998// TI - Bias in location and selection of studies JO - BMJ: British Medical Journal VL - 316 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 DO - 10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 ID - Egger1998 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Munder, T. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews JO - Clin Psychol Rev VL - 33 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.002 DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.002 ID - Munder2013 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Goodman, S. AU - Dickersin, K. PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - Metabias: a challenge for comparative effectiveness research JO - Ann Intern Med VL - 155 UR - https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00010 DO - 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00010 ID - Goodman2011 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Elia, N. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors JO - BMJ Open VL - 6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442 DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442 ID - Elia2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Humaidan, P. AU - Polyzos, N. P. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - (Meta) analyze this: systematic reviews might lose credibility JO - Nat Med VL - 18 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0912-1321 DO - 10.1038/nm0912-1321 ID - Humaidan2012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Borah, R. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry JO - BMJ Open VL - 7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545 DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545 ID - Borah2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Silagy, C. A. AU - Middleton, P. AU - Hopewell, S. PY - 2002 DA - 2002// TI - Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned JO - JAMA VL - 287 UR - https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2831 DO - 10.1001/jama.287.21.2831 ID - Silagy2002 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Kirkham, J. J. AU - Altman, D. G. AU - Williamson, P. R. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process JO - PLoS One VL - 5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009810 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0009810 ID - Kirkham2010 ER - TY - STD TI - Page MJ, et al. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of biomedical research: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2016:13(5). ID - ref18 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Moher, D. PY - 2009 DA - 2009// TI - Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement JO - Ann Intern Med VL - 151 UR - https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 DO - 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 ID - Moher2009 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Moher, D. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement JO - Systematic reviews VL - 4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 DO - 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 ID - Moher2015 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Wasiak, J. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management ID - Wasiak2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Dudden, R. F. AU - Protzko, S. L. PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian JO - Medical reference services quarterly VL - 30 UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590425 DO - 10.1080/02763869.2011.590425 ID - Dudden2011 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ioannidis, J. P. PY - 2005 DA - 2005// TI - Why most published research findings are false JO - PLoS Med VL - 2 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 ID - Ioannidis2005 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ebrahim, S. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Meta-analyses with industry involvement are massively published and report no caveats for antidepressants JO - J Clin Epidemiol VL - 70 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.021 DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.021 ID - Ebrahim2016 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Gómez-García, F. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest, and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality ID - Gómez-García2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Bes-Rastrollo, M. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews JO - PLoS Med VL - 10 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578 DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578 ID - Bes-Rastrollo2014 ER - TY - CHAP AU - Spiegelhalter, D. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - The importance of what you don’t see BT - [Blog] Understanding Uncertainty ID - Spiegelhalter2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Eisner, M. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Disclosure of financial conflicts of interests in interventions to improve child psychosocial health: a cross-sectional study JO - PLoS One VL - 10 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142803 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0142803 ID - Eisner2015 ER - TY - STD TI - Lieb K, et al. Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016:6(4). ID - ref29 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Gøtzsche, P. C. AU - Ioannidis, J. P. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses? JO - BMJ VL - 345 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7031 DO - 10.1136/bmj.e7031 ID - Gøtzsche2012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Fleurence, R. L. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Engaging patients and stakeholders in research proposal review: the patient-centered outcomes research institute JO - Ann Intern Med VL - 161 UR - https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-2412 DO - 10.7326/M13-2412 ID - Fleurence2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Basch, E. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research JO - JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association VL - 307 UR - https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.466 DO - 10.1001/jama.2012.466 ID - Basch2012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Catalá-López, F. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis JO - BMC Med VL - 12 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-15 DO - 10.1186/1741-7015-12-15 ID - Catalá-López2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Lomas, J. PY - 2000 DA - 2000// TI - Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation JO - Health Aff VL - 19 UR - https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.236 DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.236 ID - Lomas2000 ER - TY - BOOK AU - Boudreau, K. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - The novelty paradox & bias for normal science: evidence from randomized medical grant proposal evaluations ID - Boudreau2012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Steckler, A. AU - McLeroy, K. R. PY - 2008 DA - 2008// TI - The importance of external validity JO - Am J Public Health VL - 98 UR - https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847 DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847 ID - Steckler2008 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Petticrew, M. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’ JO - Systematic reviews VL - 4 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0027-1 DO - 10.1186/s13643-015-0027-1 ID - Petticrew2015 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Nasser, M. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - An equity lens can ensure an equity-oriented approach to agenda setting and priority setting of Cochrane Reviews JO - J Clin Epidemiol VL - 66 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.11.013 DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.11.013 ID - Nasser2013 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Burford, B. J. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 reporting guideline: the perspectives of systematic review authors JO - PLoS One VL - 8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075122 DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0075122 ID - Burford2013 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ioannidis, J. P. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis JO - Lancet VL - 383 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8 DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8 ID - Ioannidis2014 ER - TY - STD TI - Shea BJ, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7 ID - ref41 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Andrews, J. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations JO - J Clin Epidemiol VL - 66 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013 DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013 ID - Andrews2013 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Guyatt, G. H. PY - 2008 DA - 2008// TI - GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations JO - BMJ: British Medical Journal VL - 336 UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD DO - 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD ID - Guyatt2008 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Glasziou, P. AU - Djulbegovic, B. AU - Burls, A. PY - 2006 DA - 2006// TI - Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials? JO - Lancet VL - 367 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68919-8 DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68919-8 ID - Glasziou2006 ER -