Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Complications and health-related quality of life after robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of four RCTs

Systematic Reviews20176:150

Received: 21 December 2016

Accepted: 20 July 2017

Published: 2 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
21 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - G Simone
11 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elaine Beller
17 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Susanne Lauridsen
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0547-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Clinical Health Promotion Centre, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark
Clinical Health Promotion Centre, Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital and Centre of Research in Rehabilitation, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Abdominal Centre, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark