Usability evaluation methods employed to assess information visualisations of electronically stored patient data for clinical use: a protocol for a systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Panos Balatsoukas|
|25 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Antonia Burt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Antonia Burt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0544-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.