This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Usability evaluation methods employed to assess information visualisations of electronically stored patient data for clinical use: a protocol for a systematic review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 July 2016
Accepted: 17 July 2017
Published: 28 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Panos Balatsoukas|
|25 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Antonia Burt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Antonia Burt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0544-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.