Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Usability evaluation methods employed to assess information visualisations of electronically stored patient data for clinical use: a protocol for a systematic review

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 4Email author
Systematic Reviews20176:148

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0544-1

Received: 18 July 2016

Accepted: 17 July 2017

Published: 28 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Panos Balatsoukas
25 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Antonia Burt
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Antonia Burt
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
17 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0544-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
(2)
Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Level 6, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
(3)
Bodleian Health Care Libraries, Level 3, Academic Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
(4)
Intensive Care and Acute Medicine, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK

Advertisement