Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Methodology
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews

Systematic Reviews20176:145

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3

Received: 27 February 2017

Accepted: 28 June 2017

Published: 18 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dawid Pieper
19 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Madeleine Ballard
23 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robin Featherstone
1 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Alex Pollock
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
28 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0534-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions (NMAHP) Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
(2)
UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK
(3)
University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
(4)
NHS Blood and Transplant Oxford and Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Advertisement