Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical manifestations and diagnostic methods in pulmonary angiosarcoma: protocol for a scoping review

Systematic Reviews20176:136

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0531-6

Received: 24 March 2017

Accepted: 22 June 2017

Published: 10 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Lim
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yihan He
2 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rudolf Fehrmann
12 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Lim
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
10 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0531-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Canada
(2)
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
(3)
Department of Medicine, Vancouver, Canada

Advertisement