Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Protocol
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

An investigation of the impact of using different methods for network meta-analysis: a protocol for an empirical evaluation

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 4, 5,
  • 6,
  • 2 and
  • 1Email author
Systematic Reviews20176:119

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0511-x

Received: 26 April 2017

Accepted: 6 June 2017

Published: 24 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
12 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alejandro Gonzalez
13 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Long Ge
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
6 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
24 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0511-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
(2)
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
(3)
University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
(4)
MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK
(5)
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
(6)
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada

Advertisement