Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Stress ulcer prophylaxis versus placebo or no prophylaxis in adult hospitalised acutely ill patients—protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

  • Søren Marker1, 3Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Anders Perner1, 3,
  • Jørn Wetterslev2, 3,
  • Marija Barbateskovic2, 3,
  • Janus Christian Jakobsen2, 3, 4,
  • Mette Krag1,
  • Anders Granholm1,
  • Carl Thomas Anthon1 and
  • Morten Hylander Møller1, 3
Systematic Reviews20176:118

Received: 26 January 2017

Accepted: 1 June 2017

Published: 24 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
26 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Burry
19 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jianping Liu
24 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Søren Marker
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
24 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0509-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Intensive Care, 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Cardiology, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark