Skip to main content

Table 2 Information reported by reports about included SRs

From: Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study

Assessment of characteristics at the report level

Reports assessing MQ only

Reports assessing MQ and RQ or RQ only

All reports

N = 50, n (%)

N = 26, n (%)

N = 76, n (%)

Source of funding

25 (50)

19 (73)

44 (58)

Conflict of interest

22 (44)

12 (46)

34 (45)

Heterogeneity investigated

32 (64)

15 (58)

47 (62)

Meta-analysis results reported

22 (44)

10 (38)

32 (42)

Updated reviews

6 (12)

7 (27)

13 (17)

Publication bias

25 (50)

13 (50)

38 (50)

Limitations discussed

2 (4)

14 (54)

16 (21)

Critically appraised abstracts

0 (0)

22 (85)

22 (29)

Interpretation consistent with results

21 (42)

8 (31)

29 (38)

Provided quantitative summary of quality or reporting across reviews

29 (58)

16 (62)

45 (59)

  1. MQ methodological quality, RQ reporting quality