This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 20 September 2016
Accepted: 31 May 2017
Published: 19 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M. Constantine Samaan|
|9 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kusala Pussegoda|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xiaoqin Wang|
|12 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kusala Pussegoda|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.