Author | Joint | Comparators |
---|---|---|
Garcia-Rey 2008 [20] | Hip | Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene liner THR vs. highly cross-linked polyethylene liner THR |
Glyn-Jones 2008a [21] | Hip | Highly cross-linked polyethylene liner THR vs. ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene liner THR |
Glyn-Jones 2008b [22] | Hip | Highly cross-linked polyethylene liner THR vs. ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene liner THR |
Hamadouche 2008 [23] | Hip | Polished femoral stem THR vs. matte femoral stem THR |
Lachiewicz 2008 [24] | Hip | Polished femoral stem THR vs. pre-coated femoral stem THR |
Macaulay 2008 [25] | Hip | Hemiarthroplasty vs. THR |
Meneghini 2008 [26] | Hip | Two incision minimally invasive THR vs. mini-posterior approach THR vs. mini-anterolateral approach THR |
Mouzopoulos 2008 [27] | Hip | Hemiarthroplasty vs. THR vs. internal fixation |
Pagnano 2008 [28] | Hip | Mini-incision THR vs. two incision THR |
Pitto 2008 [29] | Hip | Polyethylene liner THR ceramic liner THR |
Barrett 2013 [30] | Hip | Direct anterior approach THR vs. posterolateral approach THR |
Bjorgul 2013 [31] | Hip | Metal-on-metal bearing THR vs. metal-on-polyethylene bearing THR vs. ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing THR |
Cadossi 2013 [32] | Hip | Hemiarthroplasty vs. polycarbonateurethane acetabular component THR |
Desmarchelier 2013 [33] | Hip | Metal-on-metal bearing THR vs. ceramic-on-ceramic bearing THR |
Greidanus 2013 [34] | Hip | Minimally invasive anterolateral approach THR vs. minimally invasive direct lateral approach THR vs. minimally invasive posterolateral approach THR |
Hedbeck 2013 [35] | Hip | Cemented hemiarthroplasty vs. internal fixation |
Inngul 2013 [36] | Hip | Unipolar hemiarthroplasty vs. bipolar hemiarthroplasty |
Kim 2013 [37] | Hip | Alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing THR vs. alumina on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing THR |
Landgraeber 2013 [38] | Hip | Minimally invasive THR vs. conventional THR |
Munzinger 2013 [39] | Hip | Titanium plasma-sprayed cup THR vs. titanium plasma-sprayed cup with additional hydroxyapatite coating THR |
Naudie 2013 [40] | Hip | Sintered bead porous surface shell THR vs. titanium anatomic porous surface THR |
Penny 2013 [41] | Hip | Standard THR vs. large head THR vs. resurfacing hip replacement |
Smolders 2013 [42] | Hip | Resurfacing hip replacement vs. THR |
Stiehler 2013 [43] | Hip | Navigated hip resurfacing vs. conventional hip resurfacing |
Venditolli 2013 [44] | Hip | Alumina on alumina vs. metal-on-polyethylene THR |
Vidovic 2013 [45] | Hip | Cemented hemiarthroplasty vs. cementless hemiarthroplasty |
Zagra 2013 [46] | Hip | 28 vs 36 vs. 42Â mm bearing THR |
Breugem 2008 [47] | Knee | Fixed bearing TKR vs. mobile bearing TKR |
Chaudhary 2008 [48] | Knee | Posterior cruciate stabilising TKR vs. posterior cruciate-retaining TKR |
Dutton 2008 [49] | Knee | Computer-assisted minimally invasive TKR vs. conventional TKR |
Findlay 2008 [50] | Knee | Cemented TKR vs. uncemented TKR |
Hall 2008 [51] | Knee | Single radius of curvature femoral component TKR vs. multi-radius of curvature femoral component TKR |
Han 2008 [52] | Knee | Minimally invasive TKR vs. conventional TKR |
Hansson 2008 [53] | Knee | HA-coated TKR vs. Not HA-coated TKR |
Harato 2008 [54] | Knee | Posterior cruciate-retaining TKR vs. Posterior cruciate substituting TKR |
Karachalios 2008 [55] | Knee | Mini-mid vastus approach TKR standard approach TKR |
Ladermann 2008 [56] | Knee | Fixed bearing TKR vs. mobile bearing TKR |
Lionberger 2008 [57] | Knee | Electromagnetic navigation TKR vs. infrared navigation TKR |
Lozano 2008 [58] | Knee | Extramedullary tibial guide TKR vs. intramedullary tibial guide TKR |
Luring 2008 [59] | Knee | Navigated TKR vs. minimally invasive TKR vs. conventional TKR |
Lutzner 2008 [60] | Knee | Navigated TKR vs. conventional TKR |
Nutton 2008 [61] | Knee | Standard Nexgen TKR vs. high flexion Nexgen TKR |
Oberst 2008 [62] | Knee | Navigated TKR vs. conventional TKR |
Smith 2008 [63] | Knee | Patellar resurfacing TKR vs. no patellar resurfacing TKR |
Therbo 2008 [64] | Knee | HA coated tibial component TKR vs. no HA on tibial component TKR |
Wylde 2008 [65] | Knee | Fixed bearing TKR vs. mobile bearing TKR |
Aggarwal 2013 [66] | Knee | Fixed bearing TKR vs. mobile bearing TKR |
Breeman 2013 [67] | Knee | Mobile bearing TKR vs. fixed bearing TKR |
Chareancholvanich 2013 [68] | Knee | Patient-specific cutting guide TKR vs. conventional instrumentation TKR |
Dennis 2013 [69] | Knee | High flexion TKR vs. standard device TKR |
Fischer 2013 [70] | Knee | High flexion TKR vs. standard device TKR |
Hamilton DF 2013a [71] | Knee | Triathlon TKR vs. Kinemax TKR |
Hamilton DF 2013b [72] | Knee | Triathlon TKR vs. Kinemax TKR |
Hamilton WG 2013 [73] | Knee | Patient-specific instrumentation TKR vs. traditional instrumentation TKR |
Jarvis 2013 [74] | Knee | Standard parapatellar approach TKR vs. mini-parapatellar approach TKR |
Joseph 2013 [75] | Knee | Computer navigation TKR vs. no computer navigation TKR |
Jung 2013 [76] | Knee | Intramedullary alignment TKR vs. extra-medullary alignment TKR |
Nieuwenhuijse 2013 [77] | Knee | LPS-flex mobile TKR vs. LPS-flex-fixed TKR vs. LPS-fixed TKR vs. LPS mobile TKR |
Nishizawa 2013 [78] | Knee | Cruciate-retaining TKR vs. posterior stabilised TKR |
Pandit 2013 [79] | Knee | Cemented unicompartmental knee replacement vs. cementless unicompartmental knee replacement |
Radetzki 2013 [80] | Knee | High-flex NexGen LPS flex mobile bearing TKR vs. NexGen LPS TKR |
Roh 2013 [81] | Knee | Patient-specific instruments TKR vs. conventional instruments TKR |
Song 2013 [82] | Knee | Robotic-assisted TKR vs. conventional TKR instruments |
Umrani 2013 [83] | Knee | Patellar eversion TKR vs. no patellar eversion TKR |
Wegrzyn 2013 [84] | Knee | Mini-subvastus approach TKR vs. medial parapatellar approach TKR |
Yim 2013 [85] | Knee | Robot-assisted classical alignment TKR vs. robot-assisted anatomical alignment TKR |
Fialka 2008 [86] | Shoulder | Has shoulder hemiarthroplasty vs. epoca shoulder hemiarthroplasty |
Soliman 2013 [87] | Shoulder | Hemiarthroplasty and tenodesis of the long head of the biceps vs. hemiarthroplasty without tenodesis of the long head of the biceps |
Lapner 2013 [88] | Shoulder | Tuberosity osteotomy shoulder replacement vs. subscapularis peel shoulder replacement |
Hansen 2013 [89] | Hand | Cemented vs. uncemented cups in total trapeziometacarpal joint prostheses |