This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Do outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of joint replacement surgery fulfil the OMERACT 2.0 Filter? A review of the 2008 and 2013 literature
- Peter D. H. Wall1,
- Bethan L. Richards2, 3,
- Andrew Sprowson^1,
- Rachelle Buchbinder4, 5 and
- Jasvinder A. Singh6, 7Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 December 2016
Accepted: 10 May 2017
Published: 30 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melainie Cameron|
|28 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ainslea Cross|
|3 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Wall|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melainie Cameron|
|8 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ainslea Cross|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|30 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0498-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.