This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of the effect of oral care with four different antiseptics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: protocol for a network meta-analysis
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 December 2016
Accepted: 8 May 2017
Published: 19 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Jull|
|20 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - zhigang Zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Jull|
|6 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - zhigang Zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0496-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.