This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Conclusions in systematic reviews of mammography for breast cancer screening and associations with review design and author characteristics
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 14 September 2016
Accepted: 5 May 2017
Published: 22 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ralph Möhler|
|17 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eric Apaydin|
|5 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Smriti Raichand|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ralph Möhler|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0495-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.