Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Conclusions in systematic reviews of mammography for breast cancer screening and associations with review design and author characteristics

  • Smriti Raichand1, 2,
  • Adam G. Dunn1Email author,
  • Mei-Sing Ong1, 3, 5,
  • Florence T. Bourgeois3, 4,
  • Enrico Coiera1 and
  • Kenneth D. Mandl3, 5
Systematic Reviews20176:105

Received: 14 September 2016

Accepted: 5 May 2017

Published: 22 May 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
14 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ralph Möhler
17 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eric Apaydin
5 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Smriti Raichand
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ralph Möhler
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 May 2017 Editorially accepted
22 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0495-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, USA
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA