Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The risk associated with spinal manipulation: an overview of reviews

  • Sabrina Mai Nielsen1,
  • Simon Tarp1,
  • Robin Christensen1,
  • Henning Bliddal2,
  • Louise Klokker1 and
  • Marius Henriksen3Email author
Systematic Reviews20176:64

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0458-y

Received: 21 November 2016

Accepted: 15 March 2017

Published: 24 March 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lindsay Gorrell
21 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simon French
21 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
15 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
24 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0458-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg & Bispebjerg, Frederiksberg, Denmark
(2)
Clinical Research Unit, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg & Bispebjerg, Frederiksberg, Denmark
(3)
Physiotherapy and Biomechanics Research Unit, The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg & Bispebjerg, Frederiksberg, Denmark

Advertisement