Commentary
Open Access
Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
An approach to addressing subpopulation considerations in systematic reviews: the experience of reviewers supporting the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- Evelyn P. Whitlock1,
- Michelle Eder2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Jamie H. Thompson2,
- Daniel E. Jonas3,
- Corinne V. Evans2,
- Janelle M. Guirguis-Blake4 and
- Jennifer S. Lin2
Received: 6 October 2016
Accepted: 17 February 2017
Published: 2 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Jan 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Evelyn Whitlock |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Feb 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Larissa Shamseer |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Feb 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Mar 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s13643-017-0437-3 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington DC, USA
(2)
Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, USA
(3)
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
(4)
Department of Family Medicine, Tacoma Family Medicine Residency Program, University of Washington, Tacoma, USA
