Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Outcomes of dysvascular partial foot amputation and how these compare to transtibial amputation: a systematic review for the development of shared decision-making resources

Systematic Reviews20176:54

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0433-7

Received: 27 May 2016

Accepted: 15 February 2017

Published: 14 March 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerasimos Bastas
5 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alyson Littman
16 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kerry Dwan
14 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Michael P Dillon
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Michael P Dillon
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
15 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-017-0433-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Discipline of Prosthetics and Orthotics, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University
(2)
Northwestern University Prosthetics-Orthotics Centre, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University

Advertisement