From: Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study
Pre knowledge brokering | Post knowledge brokering | Change from pre to post knowledge brokering | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Meana | 95% confidence limits | p | ||
Lower | Upper | |||||||
Clarity about why the review was commissioned | 4.67 | 1.46 | 5.37 | 0.95 | 0.681 | 0.249 | 1.114 | 0.002 |
Clarity of the review questions | 4.47 | 1.39 | 5.22 | 1.01 | 0.755 | 0.282 | 1.228 | 0.002 |
Clarity of the scope | 3.92 | 1.41 | 5.16 | 1.08 | 1.228 | 0.816 | 1.641 | <0.001 |
Clarity of the method | 3.883 | 1.32 | 4.55 | 1.28 | 0.669 | 0.308 | 1.029 | <0.001 |
Clarity of the report inclusions | 4.35 | 1.35 | 5.37 | 0.78 | 1.026 | 0.612 | 1.439 | <0.001 |
Reviewers’ confidence | 3.84 | 1.30 | 4.86 | 1.19 | 1.018 | 0.537 | 1.500 | <0.001 |