This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- Ian J. Saldanha1Email author,
- Christopher H. Schmid2,
- Joseph Lau3,
- Kay Dickersin1,
- Jesse A. Berlin4,
- Jens Jap5,
- Bryant T. Smith5,
- Simona Carini6,
- Wiley Chan7,
- Berry De Bruijn8,
- Byron C. Wallace9,
- Susan M. Hutfless10,
- Ida Sim11,
- M. Hassan Murad12,
- Sandra A. Walsh13,
- Elizabeth J. Whamond14 and
- Tianjing Li1
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 26 September 2016
Accepted: 3 November 2016
Published: 22 November 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Author responded||Author comments|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Nov 2016||Editorially accepted|
|22 Nov 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13643-016-0373-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.