Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of compliance to PRISMA reporting guidelines

From: Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines

PRISMA item Published (n = 33) (%) Unpublished (n = 33) (%)
Title   
1. Self-reports as a rapid review 84.85 48.48
Abstract   
2. Structured summary 93.94 12.12
Introduction   
3. Rationale 87.88 78.79
4. Objectives 69.70 48.48
Methods   
5. Protocol and registration 3.03 9.09
6. Eligibility criteria 48.48 57.58
7. Information sources 90.91 72.73
8. Search 69.70 72.73
9. Study selection 63.64 45.45
10. Data collection process 36.36 24.24
11. Data items 39.39 33.33
12. ROB in individual studies 45.45 42.42
13. Summary measures 25.00* 50.00*
14. Synthesis of results 63.64 42.42
15. ROB across studies 30.30 33.33
16. Additional analyses 3.03 9.09
Results   
17. Study selection 75.76 30.30
18. Study characteristics 48.48 57.58
19. ROB within studies 48.48 48.48
20. Results of individual studies 42.42 57.58
21. Synthesis of results 93.94 81.82
22. ROB across studies 18.18 30.30
23. Additional analysis 3.03 12.12
Discussion   
24. Summary of evidence 75.76 72.73
25. Limitations 39.39 39.39
26. Conclusions 100.0 78.79
Funding   
27. Funding 64.64 39.39
  1. *Indicates that statistic was calculated only for rapid reviews that aimed to perform statistical synthesis/meta-analysis