Study | Study design/setting | Participants | Intervention and control conditions | Outcomes of interest to the review |
---|---|---|---|---|
Carr 1992 [42] | Individually randomised trial Olympic Training Centre (OTC) in Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA. | Eight resident teams of elite athletes representing archery, gymnastics, shooting, table tennis and handball. Intervention group: 30 athletes; control group: 23 athletes Age: mean 21.3 (SD 4.1) Gender: males 59 %, females 41 % Inclusion criteria: athletes in resident training programmes at the OTC. | Intervention condition: multimodal substance abuse programme based on a cognitive-behavioural model, which included: • education component (2.5 h) • decision-making/coping skills component (3 h) • social skills/self-esteem component (2.5 h). Each component included lecture presentations, group discussions, role-play exercises, and written materials. Control condition: no intervention. Intervention offered after trial period. | All outcomes were assessed at pre-test, post-test and at the end of a 7-week follow-up period via self-completed questionnaires. • Frequency of use of alcohol in the last month • Change score for frequency of use in alcohol in the last month from pre-test to follow-up, coded as: 1 = decrease in use 2 = no change 3 = increase |
Kingsland et al. 2015 [44] | Cluster randomised controlled trial Non-elite, community football clubs within the Hunter, New England and Sydney regions of New South Wales, Australia | Eighty-eight football clubs (rugby league, rugby union, soccer/association football and Australian rules football) and club members. Intervention group: 43 clubs; 700 members at pre-intervention cross section; 567 members post-intervention cross section. Control group: 45 clubs; 711 members pre-intervention cross section; 577 members post-intervention cross section. Members pre-intervention: Age: average 30 years+ Gender: intervention group 77.4 % male; control group 87 % male) Role: intervention group 60 % players, 26 % members/supporters, 14 % officials; control group 47 % players, 36 % members/supporters, 17 % officials. Inclusion criteria: Clubs: community level, non-elite football clubs who had over 40 members, sold alcohol and were not participating in an alcohol management improvement program. Members: club member who were 18+ years and spoke English | Intervention condition: 2.5 year accreditation programme which included: • Adherence to liquor licence requirement in terms of signage and alcohol service hours and areas • Staff trained in responsible service of alcohol • Water and substantial food is provided • Intoxicated people not permitted to enter, not served alcohol and not permitted to remain at the club • Alcoholic drinks are only served in standard drink measures • Club maintains a register of alcohol-related incidents • Bar servers do not consume alcohol • Non-alcoholic drinks and low-alcoholic drinks are available and are cheaper than full-strength alcoholic drinks • Club does not serve ‘shots’ or double-nips of alcohol or ready-to-drink products over 5 % alcohol/volume • Club does not conduct drinking games/promotions that encourage risky alcohol consumption • Club has some sponsorship that is not from the alcohol industry • Club has developed a written alcohol management policy and distributed it to members. Implementation supports: based on theoretical frameworks for organisational change and consisted of: project officer support, implementation cost recovery, accreditation and associated merchandise, printed resources and newsletters, observational audits and feedback online training and letters of support from state sporting organisation. Control condition: control (and intervention) clubs were given printed resources on topics unrelated to the trial outcomes. | All outcomes were assessed at pre- and post-intervention using self-reported measures collected via telephone survey. • Risky alcohol consumption defined as ≥5 standard drinks on the one occasion • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): ▪ Median total AUDIT score ▪ Total AUDIT score of ≥8 (indicative of hazardous consumption) ▪ Alcohol consumption subscale (score ≥6 for items 1–3) ▪ Dependency subscale (score of ≥4 for items 4–6) ▪ Alcohol-related problems subscale (score ≥1 for items 7–10). All outcome analyses adjusted for clustering and pre-intervention values. |
O’ Farrell 2010 [43] | Cluster randomised controlled trial Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA) amateur sporting clubs in the Republic of Ireland. | Forty-one hurling, Gaelic football and handball clubs within two counties in Ireland and club players. Intervention group: 12 clubs; 332 members at pre-intervention; 218 members post-intervention. Control group: 29 clubs; 628 members pre-intervention; 441 members post-intervention. Players pre-intervention: Mean age: 24 years Gender: All male Inclusion criteria: clubs: within two study counties in Ireland Players: uninjured GAA male club players aged 16 years and above. | Intervention condition: Community mobilisation approach targeting the club environment and individual player behaviour implemented over four months. Intervention included: • Alcohol education for the players (1x50mins) • Alcohol education for coaches (1x40mins) • Alcohol policy training for club managers and coaches (1 × 40 min) • Alcohol information media campaign Implementation supports: health promotion staff, presentation materials, handouts and advertising materials. Control condition: control (and intervention clubs) received an education session on sports nutrition. | All outcomes were assessed at pre- and post-intervention using self-reported measures via paper questionnaires: • Alcohol use disorder identification test (AUDIT): ▪ Mean total AUDIT score ▪ Total AUDIT score of ≥ 8 ▪ AUDIT hazardous alcohol use subscale (score ≥6 for items 1–3) ▪ AUDIT dependency subscale (score ≥4 for items 4–6) ▪ AUDIT harmful alcohol use subscale (score ≥1 for items 7–10). • Yearly alcohol consumption (litres of pure alcohol) • ≥21 standard drinks per week • Binge drinking (≥6 drinks one sitting) • Mean alcohol-related harms score (of total of 13) |