Stages of review | Aim/purpose | Details |
---|---|---|
(1) Problem formulation | To clearly state topic of interest and purpose of review | • List variables of interest • Set focus and boundaries |
(2) Literature search | To make explicit and justify search strategy and sampling criteria | • Specify databases and other search methods • State type of literature to be included (e.g. published/unpublished) • Detail key words • Acknowledge publication bias |
(3) Data evaluation | To assess type, scope, diversity, and quality of accessed literature | • Specify different types of study found and classify into sub-groups • Decide on quality criteria instruments for each type of study |
(4) Data synthesis | To specify systematic analytical method To create an innovative synthesis To formulate a unified and integrated conclusion | • Data reduction: simplify sub-groups into a manageable framework according to the type (e.g. qualitative, comparative, experimental); create short summaries of each primary source • Data display: create charts or visual network displays to show connection within each sub-group type • Data comparison: identify patterns, themes, relationships, and major variables within and between sub-groups • Conclusion drawing and verification: creative and critical analysis of data, acknowledging commonalities and differences, and including any justifiable generalisations • Production of integrative summation |
(5) Presentation | To capture the depth and breadth of the topic and produce a comprehensive understanding | • Summary should contribute to a new understanding • Specify implications for practice, research, and policy • Note limitations of the review as a whole |