For intervention studies | For observational (prospective cohort and cross-sectional) studies | For qualitative studies |
---|---|---|
Total quality assessment score (maximum of 8) was derived for the fulfilment of following criteria: | Total quality assessment score (maximum of 6) was derived for the fulfilment of following criteria: | Total quality assessment score (maximum of 12) was derived for the fulfilment of following criteria: |
1) Randomisation | 1) More than 50 participants analysed | 1) Research questions clearly stated |
2) Effect of intervention reported for all outcomes | 2) Studies representing general population | 2) Approach appropriate for the research question |
3) Pre-intervention data on all outcomes | 3) Prospective study design | 3) Qualitative approach clearly justified |
4) Post-intervention data on all outcomes | 4) Adjusted/multivariate analysis | 4) Study context clearly described |
5) Allocation concealment | 5) Objective measure of outcome | 5) Role of the researcher clearly described |
6) Blinding | 6) Objective measure of exposure | 6) Sampling method clearly described |
7) Objective measurement of outcome | Â | 7) Sampling strategy appropriate for the research question |
8) Retention >70Â % | Â | 8) Method of data collection clearly described |
Studies with small sample size (n < 50) and no control group were considered to provide lower quality evidence and not scored |  | 9) Data collection method appropriate |
 | 10) Method of analysis clearly described | |
 | 11) Analysis appropriate for the research question | |
 | 12) Conclusions supported by sufficient evidence |