From: Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda
Themes | Subthemes |
---|---|
Taxonomy and definitions | a. How the various types of RRs are defined? |
b. What are the standard definitions for rapid reviews? | |
c. What are the purpose and use of the various types of RRs? | |
 • Understand how they support informed health care decision-making | |
 • Evaluate the scope and limitations of rapid reviews in health policy decision-making | |
Methods, process, and application | a. What are the core elements for RR development (for example, timelines, number of reviewers, number of databases searched)? |
b. What are the steps to conduct RRs? | |
c. How are RR questions developed? | |
 • Identify and develop products that work for various review questions and contexts | |
d. What trade-offs of time, resources, and comprehensiveness in various RR products impact results and conclusions? | |
 • Assess potential biases of RRs and the implications for reporting results | |
e. What are the appropriate search strategies, including different approaches to text mining, and streamlined approaches? | |
f. What are the best practices for data synthesis, reporting, and interpretation? | |
g. What are the best practices for communicating results and knowledge mobilization? | |
h. Is it appropriate to use RRs for health care decision-making? | |
 • Determine when and when not to use RR | |
i. What are the best practices for working with end users? | |
Compare and contrast rapid reviews with systematic reviews | a. What are the similarities and differences in methods between RRs and SRs and their implications for results? |
 • Investigate how to quantify bias in conclusions and recommendations | |
b. What are the qualitative versus quantitative methods for RRs with SR counterparts? | |
c. What are the strengths and limitations of RRs versus SRs? | |
 • Address potential biases, accuracy, and precision of RRs vs SRs | |
 • Consider perspectives of producers and users | |
 • Identify shortcuts that can be used in RR products without compromising their quality | |
Evaluate use (including for quality assurance and impact) | a. How are RRs and SRs used by various organizations? |
 • Identify who are the users of RRs and how they use them | |
 • Measure and quantify their use and impact in health care decision-making | |
b. What are the risks decision makers are willing to accept in using RRs? | |
c. What is the impact on policy decisions and practice change? | |
d. Is it appropriate to use rapid reviews in cost-effectiveness analyses? | |
Database | a. What are the opportunities and constraints for a RR international database or clearinghouse? |
b.How can the identification of RRs be improved to reduce duplicate requests? | |
Influencing RR practice | a. How can the application of RRs be enhanced among their users? |
 • Educate end users regarding what is feasible with RRs | |
 • Determine what end-user need(s) RRs can meet | |
 • Work with users in defining the question(s), conducting the reviews, interpreting results | |
RR tools and guideline development | a. What tools and guidelines can be developed to improve the production and reporting of RRs? |
 • AMSTAR-like tool to guide the RR process | |
 • Process map or decision tree to guide use of RRs and/or SRs | |
 • Guideline or checklist of what to include in RRs | |
 • Checklists that assist with selection of RR products suitable for questions | |
 • Flowchart of questions to support question development | |
 • Quality assessment of RR products based on content and validity | |
 • Reporting guidelines for RRs |