Co-publication content compared to the CEVG review
| | |
Identicala
|
3
|
(14 %)
|
Similar but not identicala
|
14
|
(64 %)
|
Abridgeda
|
3
|
(13 %)
|
Otherb
|
2
|
(9 %)
|
Journal of co-publication
| | |
Ophthalmology journal
|
12
|
(55 %)
|
Indexed in Web of Science or Scopus as of publication date
|
11/12
| |
General or other medical journal
|
10
|
(45 %)
|
Indexed in Web of Science or Scopus as of publication date
|
7/10
| |
Authorship of co-publication
| | |
Identical to CEVG review
|
11
|
(50 %)
|
Same authors, different order
|
3
|
(14 %)
|
One author added or removed
|
8
|
(36 %)
|
Co-publication timing
| | |
Before the CEVG reviewc
|
5
|
(23 %)
|
Within 2 years after CEVG review
|
14
|
(63 %)
|
More than 2 years after CEVG review
|
3
|
(14 %)
|
Co-publication based on
| | |
Original review
|
15
|
(68 %)
|
Updated review
|
7
|
(32 %)
|
Citation of the CEVG review by the co-publication
| | |
Cited
|
12
|
(55 %)
|
Not cited, but CEVG review mentioned in the text
|
4
|
(18 %)
|
Not cited or mentioned
|
6
|
(27 %)
|
Country of affiliation of co-publication first author
| | |
UK
|
16
|
(73 %)
|
USA
|
6
|
(27 %)
|
Number of included studies d
| | |
Same as CEVG review
|
16
|
(73 %)
|
Some overlap with CEVG review
|
6
|
(27 %)
|