Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies with provisional support to share individual level data

From: Re-infection outcomes following one- and two-stage surgical revision of infected hip prosthesis in unselected patients: protocol for a systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis

Lead author, publication date (reference number) Location Year of study Mean/median age (years) % male Follow-up mean/median (months) Type of re-implantation Use of spacer Number of re-infections Number of participants Type of revision
Elson et al. 1993 [21] UK NS NS NS NS NS NA 33 235 One-stage
Whittaker et al. 2009 [22] UK 1998 to 2003 69.0 49.0 49.0 Both Spacer 6 43 Two-stage
Cabrita et al. 2007 [23] Brazil 1996 to 2003 54.6 58.0 48.0 NS Spacer 4 38 Two-stage
Ritter et al. 2010 [25] USA 1969 to 2004 66.2 52.0 82.8 NS NS 5 17 Two-stage
De Man et al. 2011 [24] Switzerland 1985 to 2004 70.0 57.0 45.6 NS NS 1 55 One-stage
Neumann et al. 2012 [26] Austria 2000 to 2008 25 to 84a 56.8 67.0 Cementless Spacer 1 44 Two-stage
Schwarzkopf et al. 2014 [27] USA 2001 to 2011 62.3 46.9 32.4 Cemented Spacer 3 62 Two-stage
Zeller et al. 2014 [28] France 2002 to 2010 71.0 58.0 41.6 Cementless NA 6 157 One-stage
  1. NA, not applicable; NS, not stated; Both, some participants had cemented re-implantation and others cementless.
  2. aAge range.