Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies with provisional support to share individual level data

From: Re-infection outcomes following one- and two-stage surgical revision of infected hip prosthesis in unselected patients: protocol for a systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis

Lead author, publication date (reference number)

Location

Year of study

Mean/median age (years)

% male

Follow-up mean/median (months)

Type of re-implantation

Use of spacer

Number of re-infections

Number of participants

Type of revision

Elson et al. 1993 [21]

UK

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NA

33

235

One-stage

Whittaker et al. 2009 [22]

UK

1998 to 2003

69.0

49.0

49.0

Both

Spacer

6

43

Two-stage

Cabrita et al. 2007 [23]

Brazil

1996 to 2003

54.6

58.0

48.0

NS

Spacer

4

38

Two-stage

Ritter et al. 2010 [25]

USA

1969 to 2004

66.2

52.0

82.8

NS

NS

5

17

Two-stage

De Man et al. 2011 [24]

Switzerland

1985 to 2004

70.0

57.0

45.6

NS

NS

1

55

One-stage

Neumann et al. 2012 [26]

Austria

2000 to 2008

25 to 84a

56.8

67.0

Cementless

Spacer

1

44

Two-stage

Schwarzkopf et al. 2014 [27]

USA

2001 to 2011

62.3

46.9

32.4

Cemented

Spacer

3

62

Two-stage

Zeller et al. 2014 [28]

France

2002 to 2010

71.0

58.0

41.6

Cementless

NA

6

157

One-stage

  1. NA, not applicable; NS, not stated; Both, some participants had cemented re-implantation and others cementless.
  2. aAge range.