Skip to main content

Table 3 Sensitivity† and specificity‡ of SRA-DM prototype algorithms and EndNote auto-deduplication (in a dataset of 1,988 citations, including 799 duplicates)

From: Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module

 

Respiratory study

First iteration SRA-DM

Second iteration SRA-DM

Third iteration SRA-DM

Fourth iteration SRA-DM

EndNote

True positive (n) (correctly identified duplicates)

600

765

543

674

410

False negative (n) (duplicates missed)

199

34

256

125

391

Sensitivity (%)

75.1

95.7

68.0

84.4

51.2

True negative (n) (correctly identified unique records)

1,188

1,186

1,189

1,189

1,185

False positive (n) (incorrectly identified as duplicates)

1

3

0

0

2

Specificity (%)

99.9

99.8

100.0

100.0

99.8