Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evidence-based mapping of design heterogeneity prior to meta-analysis: a systematic review and evidence synthesis

  • Michelle D Althuis1Email author,
  • Douglas L Weed2 and
  • Cara L Frankenfeld3
Systematic Reviews20143:80

https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-80

Received: 2 April 2014

Accepted: 11 June 2014

Published: 23 July 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Apr 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Althuis
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barnaby Reeves
6 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Althuis
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
11 Jun 2014 Editorially accepted
23 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/2046-4053-3-80

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
EpiContext
(2)
DLW Consulting Services, LLC
(3)
Department of Global and Community Health, George Mason University

Advertisement