Skip to main content

Table 3 Truth table for model 1: community engagement models as the conditions and ‘highly effective intervention’ as the outcome

From: Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a worked example

Empowerment

Design

Lay-led

Number of studies

Membership in the ‘highly effective intervention’ set

Raw consistency

0

1

1

1

1

1.000

0

0

1

5

0

0.666

0

0

0

3

0

0.666

1

1

1

1

0

0.333

1

1

0

1

0

0.333

0

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

  

1

0

1

0

  
  1. Note. The one configuration with raw consistency > .75 is shown in bold; configurations with raw consistency < .75 are not in bold; configurations with no cases (that is, ‘remainders’) are italicised.