Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Truth table for model 1: community engagement models as the conditions and ‘highly effective intervention’ as the outcome

From: Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a worked example

Empowerment Design Lay-led Number of studies Membership in the ‘highly effective intervention’ set Raw consistency
0 1 1 1 1 1.000
0 0 1 5 0 0.666
0 0 0 3 0 0.666
1 1 1 1 0 0.333
1 1 0 1 0 0.333
0 1 0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0   
1 0 1 0   
  1. Note. The one configuration with raw consistency > .75 is shown in bold; configurations with raw consistency < .75 are not in bold; configurations with no cases (that is, ‘remainders’) are italicised.