This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
© Nuckols et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 19 December 2013
Accepted: 29 April 2014
Published: 4 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Teryl Nuckols|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Bellis|
|21 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Conroy|
|18 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Teryl Nuckols|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Bellis|
|14 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Conroy|
|22 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Teryl Nuckols|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|22 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/2046-4053-3-56|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.