Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 May 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Unnikrishnan Bhaskaran
7 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Peng Xie
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Caldwell
26 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Peng Xie
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Caldwell
24 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Peng Xie
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Oct 2014 Editorially accepted
5 Nov 2014 Article published 10.1186/2046-4053-3-133

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement