This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Efficacy, quality of life, and acceptability outcomes of atypical antipsychotic augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Yiyun Liu†1, 2, 3,
- Xinyu Zhou†1, 2, 3,
- Bin Qin1, 2, 3,
- Cinzia Del Giovane4,
- Yuqing Zhang1, 2, 3 and
- Peng Xie1, 2, 3Email author
© Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 13 May 2014
Accepted: 27 October 2014
Published: 5 November 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 May 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Jun 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Unnikrishnan Bhaskaran|
|7 Jul 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Peng Xie|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Jul 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Caldwell|
|26 Sep 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Peng Xie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Sep 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Oct 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Caldwell|
|24 Oct 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Peng Xie|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Oct 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Oct 2014||Editorially accepted|
|5 Nov 2014||Article published||10.1186/2046-4053-3-133|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.