Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Jul 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tony Tse|
|18 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tatyana Shamliyan|
|18 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic|
|11 Sep 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Christopher Jones|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Sep 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Sep 2014||Editorially accepted|
|27 Oct 2014||Article published||10.1186/2046-4053-3-126|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.