This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
© Tetzlaff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 26 March 2012
Accepted: 25 June 2012
Published: 24 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Tetzlaff|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marian McDonagh|
|15 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xin Sun|
|19 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer Tetzlaff|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|24 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/2046-4053-1-43|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.