Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 7 To what extent do the included reviews reference each other

From: How explicable are differences between reviews that appear to address a similar research question? A review of reviews of physical activity interventions

  King, 1998[[17]] Dobbins & Beyers, 1999[[12]] Pate, 2000[[18]] Fogelholm & Lahti-Koski, 2002[[16]] Sharpe, 2003[[19]] Jacksonet al., 2005a[[14]] Jacksonet al., 2005b[[15]] Murphy & Bauman, 2007[[13]] Total cited/total possible
King, 1998 This was the first review of the eight to be published so we would not expect it to cite any of the others. 0/0
Dobbins & Beyers, 1999 - - - - - - - - 0/0
Pate, 2000 Yes - - - - - - - 1/1
Fogelholm & Lahti-Koski, 2002 Yes No No - - No No - 1/5
Sharpe, 2003 Yes No Yes - - - - - 2/3
Jackson et al., 2005a No No No No No - No - 0/6
Jackson et al., 2005b No No No No No No - - 0/6
Murphy and Bauman, 2007 No No No No No No No - 0/7
Total citations of review (column total) 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4/28
  1. - Indicates where we would not expect the review to be cited, either because it would be citing itself or because there is a year or less between review publication dates.