Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How explicable are differences between reviews that appear to address a similar research question? A review of reviews of physical activity interventions

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jan 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - LUMAAN SHEIKH
12 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Baker
13 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erica James
21 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jenny Woodman
Resubmission - Version 2
21 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erica James
20 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Baker
2 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jenny Woodman
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jenny Woodman
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
17 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/2046-4053-1-37

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement