This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Amy T Wang1, 2Email author,
- Rebecca J Mullan1,
- Melanie A Lane1,
- Ahmad Hazem1, 3,
- Chaithra Prasad2,
- Nicola W Gathaiya4,
- M Mercè Fernández-Balsells1, 5,
- Amy Bagatto1,
- Fernando Coto-Yglesias6,
- Jantey Carey1,
- Tarig A Elraiyah1,
- Patricia J Erwin8,
- Gunjan Y Gandhi7,
- Victor M Montori1, 4 and
- Mohammad Hassan Murad1, 3
© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 November 2011
Accepted: 24 July 2012
Published: 24 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fausto Bogazzi|
|10 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Amy Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/2046-4053-1-33|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.