Skip to main content

Table 11 Strength of evidence of APAP versus CPAP

From: Auto-titrating versus fixed continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review with meta-analyses

Outcomes

Number of trials

Total number

Trials with data for Meta-analysis

Meta-analysis results comparing APAP with CPAP

Favors

Strength of evidence

Clinical outcomes (death, cardiovascular events and others)

0

0

0

N/A

 

Insufficient

Compliance

24

1008

22

0.18 hours (95% CI 0.05 to 0.31; P = 0.006)

APAP

Moderate

Apnea-Hypopnea Index

16

548

16

0.25 events/hour (95% CI -0.16 to 0.66; NS)

No difference

Moderate

Epworth Sleepiness Scale

22

954

18

-0.48 (95% CI -0.81 to -0.15; P = 0.005)

APAP

Moderate

Arousal Index

10

356

9

-0.85 events/hour (95% CI -2.2 to 0.5; NS)

No difference

Moderate

Minimum O2 saturation

9

258

9

-1.3% (95% CI -2.2 to -0.4; P = 0.003)

CPAP

Moderate

Sleep efficiency

3

126

0

 

No difference

Insufficient

Rapid eye movement sleep

9

273

0

 

No difference

Moderate

Slow wave sleep

8

243

0

 

No difference in seven trials; one trial favored APAP

Moderate

Quality of life

9

509

0

 

No difference in eight trials; one trial favored APAP

Moderate

Blood pressure

3

149

0

 

No difference in two trials; one trial favored CPAP (decrease in diastolic blood pressure)

Insufficient

  1. APAP: auto-titrating CPAP; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; N/A: not applicable; NS: non-significant.