Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul M Wilson
8 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Wilson
13 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Littell
5 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Konnyu
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul M Wilson
26 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Littell
29 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Wilson
12 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Konnyu
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Konnyu
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
10 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement