Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach

  • Sara Khangura1,
  • Kristin Konnyu1,
  • Rob Cushman2,
  • Jeremy Grimshaw3 and
  • David Moher1, 3Email author
Systematic Reviews20121:10

DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10

Received: 6 June 2011

Accepted: 10 February 2012

Published: 10 February 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul M Wilson
8 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Wilson
13 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Littell
5 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Konnyu
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul M Wilson
26 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Littell
29 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Wilson
12 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Konnyu
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kristin Konnyu
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
10 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/2046-4053-1-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
(2)
Champlain Local Health Integration Network
(3)
Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa

Advertisement